Luciane Cristina Lazzarina, Juliano Corulli Corrêab, Arlei Coldebellab, Juliano Carlos Calonegog, Paulo Hentzc, Charles William Riced, João de Andrade Bonettia, e, Iraê Amaral Guerrinia, f
a Department of Forest, Soil and Environmental Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University, UNESP, Avenida Universitária, 3780, CEP 18610-034 Botucatu, SP, Brazil
b Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, EMBRAPA, Concordia, SC, Brazil
c Santa Catarina Federal Institute IFC, Rodovia SC 283, s/n Fragosos, Concórdia, SC CEP 89703-720, Brazil
d Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, 2701 Throckmorton Center, Manhattan, KS 66506, United States
e Smart B100 Advanced Research Center (SMART B100, Agronomic Institute, Rod. Anhanguera, km 158, Cordeirópolis, SP 13492-442, Brazil
f Center for Carbon Research in Tropical Agriculture (CCARBON) – University of São Paulo, Avenida Pádua Dias 11, Piracicaba, SP 13418-900, Brazil
g Department of Crop Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University, UNESP, Avenida Universitária, 3780, CEP 18610-034 Botucatu, SP, Brazil
Highlights
- Fertilization increased surface soil C and N stocks in integrated crop–livestock and crop–livestock–forest systems.
- Organic and inorganic key microbial groups in both integrated production systems.
- Maize productivity responded more to fertilization strategies than to the production systems.
- Short-term forest integration resulted in limited differences between ICL and ICLF.